|
Post by Harkovast on Jan 17, 2015 1:54:04 GMT
But on the other hand, the Al-Saigal are very honest and honourable. They are blunt in the way they speak and don't mince words, which makes them seem even more like they are looking down on other people (which they probably are doing, but their honesty about it makes it worse!)
If an Al-Saigal tells you he'll do something, then by Thane it will be done!
Also, its worth noting a lot of their contempt is mainly aimed at the Tendu, who just piss them off on a veyr fundamental level. There is basically nothing about the Tendu that doesn't get on their nerves.
|
|
|
Post by Harkovast on Jan 17, 2015 1:58:00 GMT
We should do an RPG where everyone plays a character from a race they don't like.
Renard...do you at least like Raeeda? And Al-Harg?
|
|
|
Post by Horsie on Jan 17, 2015 2:00:58 GMT
They my be honest, but that doesn't make up for their failings, as far as I'm concerned.
I do like Raeeda, but Al-Harg gets on my nerves.
I don't think I'd want to be in an RP where I have to play a character from a race I don't like, I think I'd have to strip them of what makes them "that race" in order to enjoy it.
|
|
|
Post by Harkovast on Jan 17, 2015 2:08:36 GMT
There aren't any that I actively dislike, and I think you could make any of the races likable while still staying true to what that race is about.
I can't remember his name but there was a cool Al-Saigal guy who was helping the zadakine in chapter one. He was good!
|
|
|
Post by Horsie on Jan 17, 2015 2:15:14 GMT
He was, but on the whole I just don't like them.
I could probably find a way to RP a race I don't like, but I'd really have to put my mind to it and dig deep, and that just sounds like a chore.
|
|
|
Post by Harkovast on Jan 17, 2015 2:32:13 GMT
It's a fact that if you play a race for a while in the rpg, you end up liking them. Even people who start out luke warm to a race, after a while of getting inside their heads playing them they end up liking them.
|
|
|
Post by Horsie on Jan 17, 2015 2:34:26 GMT
I could see me playing a Tahmus for a bit, maybe a Tolpish, but I simply wouldn't play as an Al-Saigal.
|
|
|
Post by StyxD on Jan 17, 2015 12:18:22 GMT
I concur, this is all racist. So let me join in. Likes: Junlocks. They're born to be badass; they're wolves, they're free, they're equal, they run around with no shirts and glorious striped pants. And they have both "jun" and "lock" in their names, sounds I rather enjoy (I must get around to making "most and least favourite words" thread in random nonsense (which it is) when I have more time). Oh, and fun ice magic. Tsung-Dao, isn't it apparent? While rather stereotypical, I think the communal rather than feudal system is an interesting spin on their society, with a lot of interesting possibilities. I just recently realised that when you said "shogun" in the comic, you actually meant "kensei". Whoops. Zadakine. While not... let's say, I would not enjoy living in their culture, but it's a very interesting culture nonetheless. Very much not like most in fantasy. And it helps that most Zadakine who appeared in the RP are quite friendly and open folks, who stick to the values of their society, but not in your face. Nymus. They have wings and cool magic/priesthood. You know it's them who are right about Shaldemos, since they're the ones getting superpowers from gods. Ivos and Gotetra need not apply. We haven't seen a lot of their culture, but it seems to be somewhat similar to Zadakine, just less... monetary? Bardabor. The bovines are taking it in stride and just not give a shit, even if things go wrong. Plus, Glunn and Tempest's RP character (whose name I forgot) are just made of awesome. Ano-Chee. You just can't not like the foxes. Eslum have a potential to be fascinating, but I don't think I've seen enough of them. Plus, their animal is just the worst. Dislikes: Thamus. Ah, Sparta, grandmother of all fascism, how could I approve of thee? Shame, too, since I like crows. Golta. I'm sorry, but a mix of stereotypical American gun fetish with stereotypical American paranoid ignorance and disdain for foreigners just doesn't mesh with me. Darsai. They're all chummy-chummy until it's time to steamroll some other culture over barely comprehensible religious claims. Ivos. Lame animal, lame society, conquerors and slavers. Don't even have a proper power. Tolpish. Almost feeling for Golta there. They're like crazy survivalists mixed with Stockholm syndrome, and coated in Watership Down. Eldex. Their name sounds like Eldar crossed with Pokedex. I'm sorry, I had to. Besides, judging by Quinn-Tain, they're all self-righteous Knight Templars who believe their endless power struggle with the KitW trumps everything else in the world and are not bashful at all to use their power to bully other nations to do their bidding. It's probably justified, as KitW is doing the exact same thing, but still. Just imagine that the dialogue goes: "My liege, should we direct our forces against the encroaching threat of the West?" "The West? I think we'd rather focus on enemies closer to our home!" So yeah, things got pretty racist.
|
|
|
Post by Harkovast on Jan 17, 2015 14:09:02 GMT
Someone who doesn't like Golta??? What anti-charter nonsense is this?
Boars are not lame! I refute yee!
Interesting to see Bardabor on your list of favourites. Glunn for the win!
|
|
|
Post by Canuovea on Jan 17, 2015 17:57:09 GMT
Its the religion that bugs me about the Al-Saigal, but at least they don't have the slavery and decadence of the Tendu... though they go the exact opposite from them in both their good and bad aspects.
Darsai at least have the potential for comedic fucking with people's space, whereas Al-Saigal do not. And Darsai... I'm sorry, they get cool armour and their weapons are almost entirely ones I like. Arming swords, shields, spears... etc.
I agree with criticism of the Ivos' conquest and slavery. However, I find the culture beyond that interesting. Also, feral pigs/boars are dangerous and sometimes surprisingly cute. Like Junius' card art. Look at the little piggy! Other than that... the fact that they don't have any battle specific magic is actually interesting and makes me appreciate their accomplishments more. Here they are fighting superfast, tough, and strong wolf things, magic camoflauging superfast, tough, and strong fox things, and these freaks with superperfect summonable fiery weapons. Yet through organization, discipline, and good equipment (linked in some ways to their metal magic, which probably helps with maintenance as well), they win more often than not. Also, their actual differences from the Roman Empire are interesting too. Romans were very religious people, very conservative, generally very (as they saw it) moral people, yet it seems to me that the oaths and traditions of the Ivos Emperorship have been more effective at maintaining stability than the Roman Emperorship.
Fun fact. All that orgy stuff was quite likely Christian propaganda... or propaganda/history written by those against people like, say, Caligula. Fact is, such debauchery seems to have made Roman citizens generally uncomfortable.
Tolpish though... sure, survivors. They've got life magic to help them cheat with that. And similarly, while you can see value in them, Hahman for instance actually subverts much of what is expected of a Tolpish. He's decadent, narcissistic, etc... but that makes him loveable partly because he isn't like a regular Tolpish.
After that 300 movie, I find liking Spartans almost impossible. Fact of the matter is, really, that the Persians were more sympathetic than the Spartans, except in one thing: Sparta was, until the Peloponnesian War, entirely insular and uninterested in actual conquest of other nations. The Persians, however, were generally more egalitarian than the Greeks, relied somewhat less on slavery from the sound of it, and were multicultural and accepting of other peoples. Some Greeks had that whole Democracy experiment going on, but generally speaking it was... unformed and rather dangerous, no more than mob rule.
|
|
|
Post by Harkovast on Jan 17, 2015 18:32:26 GMT
The Al-Saigal have a really similar religion to the Darsai, they just have one less God! The also have seven sacred holy books, so their canon is more specific, but other wise its very similar. I will grant they are more sexist in their beleifs, but the the darsai are fairly patronising to women and are male dominated. The whole focus on martial honour and honest, straight forward conduct is all there.
And I find their grumpy, irritated demeanor loveable!
Also, Sipahi- Knight! And Al-Saigal can make bad ass force fields with air to deflect projectiles.
I'm telling you, its Darsai in the desert! And another think, Al-Saigal never pillaged any junlocks! Ask a Junlock which he prefers!
As for Ivos, they don't need magic to kick your ass. And you can't dispute how big and successful their society is. They are one of the most advanced races in Vellastrom. Also they have a pretty reasonable relationship with the Panvos, which they should get some props for. And Canuovea is right, they look cool! I'm checking out the card art and they look bad ass.
|
|
|
Post by Canuovea on Jan 17, 2015 18:42:57 GMT
The religion, yes yes, it is similar, but more strict. It isn't that they worship Thane that bugs me. Darsai at least get to drink from time to time. Sure, I'd fit in with the Al-Saigal fine when it comes to drinking, but forcing people to not do it? Also, I find lying rather difficult to swallow, even if I'm just party to it in some way. So I suppose I could fit in with the Al-Saigal a little. Also being grumpy, yeah... okay...
But the strictness and telling others what to do bothers me. But I don't really dislike their culture. And ironically enough, despite being somewhat more patriarchal, we've seen more female warriors from the Al-Saigal than we have from the Darsai... I'm writing something that might change that though. Well... it won't, actually, as there is only one of them.
Also, Darsai aren't grumpy.
The ancient Romans were very multicultural, moreso than most of anyone else around them, and were keen to accept other peoples and ideas into their Empire (the upper class, though, liked keeping their power). We see a bit of this with the Panvos, but the Ivos Empire doesn't quite demonstrate that same level. Don't see any Junlocks walking around as citizens, for instance. But on the other hand, it seems more likely that the Ivos won't end up simply genociding anyone they conquer, perhaps. They've got the most likelihood, so far, of being able to accept others into their empire. Well, aside from the White Empire and maybe the Galdrasai.
|
|
|
Post by Harkovast on Jan 17, 2015 21:24:32 GMT
Well when you say forcing people, they ban it in their own country. They haven't conquered anyone and pushed it on them forcibly. They find the tendu disgusting, but the tendu don't think any better of them. They haven't forcibly converted the tendu. Thane is the God of the Al-Saigal. Though some other people worship him (generally making obvious theological errors, but at least they aren't completely immoral), he isn't the god of the Tendu and they aren't subject to his perfect laws while in their own disgusting, immoral country.
|
|
|
Post by StyxD on Jan 17, 2015 21:48:26 GMT
See, that's one more reason why I dislike Ivos. Say anything about them and Canuovea will immediately pop up and start saying how they (and their RL buddies, Romans) are the best thing since (or before) sliced bread.
Al-Saigal... I'm deferring judgement. Haven't seen enough of them in the comic. They make me laugh, because their strict patriarchal moral codes disallow women from showing their bodies, but somehow do not prevent them from grabbing a weapon and strolling off to foreign lands. There's a glitch in the system, I tell ya.
|
|
|
Post by Canuovea on Jan 17, 2015 22:03:00 GMT
Romans were the bestest thing ever. They had the best moral system, they were the best soldiers and their political system was the most awesomest ever. They only declined because they wanted to be nice to other people. And they gave Christianity a chance, which ruined them because Christianity literally melts and destroys everything it touches. Literally. I said literally. I mean literally. I saw this one time...
Anyway. Roman historians weren't exactly known for giving a fuck about accuracy, so a lot of the things ascribed to Caligula may have been made up. But not all of them, he was certainly arrogant and possibly more than a little crazy. But it was the arrogance and sense that he was basically an absolute ruler that undid him. We know historically that he built one of his personal things through one of the temples to Castor and Pollux, I think. We know this thank to archeology. And that whole appointing the horse to the senate? That wasn't insanity, that was him making a point. He also began making preparations for the invasion of Britain, but never got the chance. See, Rome never really took to leaders thinking that they could do whatever the fuck they liked. And so Caligula lost, and the writers of the histories for that time weren't fans of his.
And if he was going full debauchery on everyone, then he would definitely have turned the people against him. Similar to Nero debasing himself by participating in, to Romans, lewd activities that he liked (like... music and acting). That wasn't the place of an Emperor.
And by forcing people, I mean putting it in their religion and making a big deal of it. They're forcing each other into not doing it, I don't mean externally. It is a silly rule to put the force of religion behind.
|
|