|
Post by wordweaver3 on Dec 30, 2016 7:34:18 GMT
I guess we need this thread now. Speaking of Jeeps. Anyone else heard about the new Jeep pickup due out sometime in 2017? www.roadandtrack.com/new-cars/future-cars/news/a29009/2017-jeep-wrangler-pickup-info/Jeep has been very tight lipped and camera shy about the new vehicle. But since it's gonna be rolling off the same line as the Wrangler I'll bet it'll look something like the Gladiator concept from 10 years ago. Really, this makes a lot of sense. Jeep spends a lot of time competing directly against themselves with models that look very similar with similar capabilities. A pickup is a no brainer, making you wonder who's carrying around the brains in the company. Considering Chrysler no longer offers a pickup smaller than the Ram, a Jeep that can fill the glaringly vacant Dakota role should sell like hotcakes.
|
|
|
Post by Horsie on Dec 30, 2016 16:10:59 GMT
Yeah, I think a lot of people would be interested in a 1/4ton Jeep pickup, though I don't think it should be surprising that they've taken so long to clue in, it took them forever to figure out that people would buy a 4-door Jeep with a longer wheelbase, and now I hear the Wrangler Unlimited sells better than the 2-door Wranglers.
I was going to ask what North American manufacturers even make 1/4ton pickups any more, but then I vaguely remembered the Colorado and Canyon, the problem I guess is that I just never see Colorados on the road, and the Canyon looks almost identical to the Sierra 1500, just slightly smaller.
|
|
|
Post by wordweaver3 on Dec 31, 2016 7:39:47 GMT
All the compact pickups went bye-bye. The Ranger, S-10, and Dakota, were all discontinued. At least in the US, the Ranger is still sold overseas. Chevy replaced the S-10 with the Colorado (GMC Canyon), but it's pretty much a full size Isuzu with some laughably under powered engine options. It doesn't have that "sport truck" feel that the S-10 or the Dakota had. They might be a little better now, but they were jokes when they came out.
But at least they tried. Ford and Dodge simply replaced their small options with full size trucks with anemic econo engines.
The 4 door Wranglers are super popular. I hardly ever see new 2 doors. Only hard core off roaders opt for the 2 doors because they want the shorter wheelbase.
|
|
|
Post by Horsie on Dec 31, 2016 15:01:15 GMT
My old man used to have an S-10, that thing got horrible mileage, I borrowed it a few times and I'd burn a quarter tank every day driving to and from work, almost all of that highway driving. I can't imagine these new full-sized trucks with small engines get fantastic mileage either, not if they're using an underpowered engine in a heavy-ass truck.
I actually see quite a few 4-doors around here that are done up for serious offroading, not as many as the 2-doors of course, but still quite a few.
|
|
|
Post by Harkovast on Dec 31, 2016 22:09:20 GMT
I am over 30 and I can't drive. I could not be more out of my depth on this thread. I like the cars....that go quick?
|
|
|
Post by Horsie on Dec 31, 2016 22:49:26 GMT
I don't really care too much how fast they go (unless we're talking about the acceleration of a Citroen 2CV, which go 0-60 in about 40 seconds), I like trucks, and things that are Jeeps, and things that aren't Jeeps but are like Jeeps.
That being said, the new Jeeps go pretty fast. And I used to borrow my buddy's 78 Ford, which seemed to top out at around 155km/h; I didn't mean to go that fast, and it felt like death at that speed, but it did it.
|
|
|
Post by wordweaver3 on Jan 1, 2017 10:25:53 GMT
Most everything nowadays is pretty peppy. In the old days a car with "pep" was a bonus. I had a 1985 300z once. While it was technically a sports car, it was pretty sloggish off the line. Did have a top speed of about 128 mph (205 kph), but the low end gearing was a joke with way too much rpm difference between gear shifts. So even if you redlined prior to shifting you were still below the power curve at the shift. Made for a frustrating drive when you wanted to rag on it. A friend of mine had an S-10 with the big 4.3 liter engine in it. Blew my fuckin doors off at the line even though I could overtake him eventually. Still, nothing makes you feel like you got the shit end of a hot rod stick when you're looking at the taillights of a pickup.
Of course the worst was my 1980 Dodge Aspen. Looked for all the world like a Duster and folks pulled up all the time wanting to race it. Problem was it had a slant six 225 ci in it that pushed (maybe) 90 horse. Like having a Mustang with a 4 cylinder in it, party on the outside but a nap under the hood.
|
|
|
Post by wordweaver3 on Mar 9, 2017 21:51:20 GMT
I'm doing a little research on a story I'm doing that takes place in mythical world that has similarities to mid 19th century America. Much of the story deals with a Transcontinental Railroad type adventure across the continent. Part of the difficulties of the adventure (admittedly, a small part) deals with toilet facilities on the vehicle. Online research is turning up shit on shit. Mostly just folks talking in forums that seem to be talking out their collective asses. I've seen several people say "do it on the shovel and toss it into the engine" but that seems, well, stupid. For one if you're talking about the engineer only. It's highly unlikely that the passengers had that option. For two I'm sure that would have been frowned on by the train company. Others said that the train simply stopped and people would "do it in the bushes", but a train has a schedule to keep. They wouldn't stop for everyone that needed to take a shit. Some say that there were no facilities and you had to wait until the train stopped every few hours for water and coal. Still, you're talking a vehicle that took entire families across the continent. Kids don't always time their pooping schedule like that. Not to mention that motion sickness would have been a huge issue on these early trains. Another one said "they just did it over the side", but you could hardly expect a woman wearing the restrictive clothing of the time to do that. Another option was a bucket that they simply dumped overboard. But for one, the bucket would get pretty nasty pretty quickly, and for two, who wants to be the one to dump it with the combined motion of the vehicle and whatever wind is present? One said they did it in a bag in a bucket and the bag was tied off, but that would have been later when plastics would have been available. A paper bag wouldn't be worth a damn for that, even if the bag was waxed.
What I suspect, even though I can't find any instances. Is that there was a small privy room in some of the cars that basically had a hole in the bottom of the train and they went right onto the tracks. Environmental concerns wouldn't have even been an issue at the time.
|
|
|
Post by Horsie on Mar 10, 2017 21:14:50 GMT
That's probably the case.
|
|
|
Post by wordweaver3 on Mar 12, 2017 4:04:40 GMT
If that was the case the transcontinental railroad was just this long line of sewage from one coast to the other.
Eww.
|
|
|
Post by demonnachos on Oct 15, 2017 16:56:15 GMT
This happened the second day I went to my new job. First day my watch broke, and car on the second. Balljoints were just replaced and the muppets that did it fucked up my hub while getting the thing out. The gits are paying to fix it though, which is good.
|
|
|
Post by wordweaver3 on Oct 16, 2017 19:44:38 GMT
The guys that didn't know what they were doing in the first place are gonna fix it?
|
|
|
Post by Horsie on Oct 17, 2017 4:08:23 GMT
I hope not.
This is why I do my own ball joints. Well, mostly because I'm a cheap bastard, but this also.
|
|
|
Post by Horsie on Jan 19, 2018 1:46:15 GMT
It's too bad there aren't more old 4x4 military cars, I stumbled across photos of these things, the Volvo TP21 "Terrain Sow"; Less than 1000 were built, the Swedes used them for radio and command cars. They had a 224 inline 6, and a curb weight of something 3.5tons, so they're not fast at all, but they look like they're built to drive through walls.
|
|
|
Post by Horsie on Feb 11, 2018 18:44:36 GMT
I picked up a used 48" Hi Lift jack for my Jeep, now I just need the mounting hardware to stick it on my tailgate.
|
|